Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 134
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1727 vs 556
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 1 July 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 vs 134 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 vs 556 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 48
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2992
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 112 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2992 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6406 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 134 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 556 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Tesla |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | G92B |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 1 July 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 1162 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 675 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 112 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 362.9 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 754 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin |