Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 16.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 108.2
- 25x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 119.7
- 23.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2792 vs 117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 8 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 vs 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 vs 119.7 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 1780
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 2992
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6387 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 6710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 108.2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 6703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 119.7 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 6912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 8 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 887 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 771 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |