Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • 16.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1780 vs 108.2
  • 25x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2992 vs 119.7
  • 23.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2792 vs 117
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 July 2019 vs 8 November 2013
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 vs 108.2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 vs 119.7
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 1780
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 2992
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 2792
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 771 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1536 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6710 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6703 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6912 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
6710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1780
108.2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
6703
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2992
119.7
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
6912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2792
117
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Geekbench - OpenCL 6387
PassMark - G2D Mark 389
PassMark - G3D Mark 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1780 6710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1780 108.2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2992 6703
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2992 119.7
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2792 6912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2792 117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1002.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 54.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 126.579

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) Kepler
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GK104
Launch date 10 July 2019 8 November 2013
Place in performance rating 813 887
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 797 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 771 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 1536
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 122 Watt
Floating-point performance 2,448 gflops
Texture fill rate 102.0 GTexel / s
Transistor count 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz

Technologies

H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0)