Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 11x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 165 Watt
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 19 September 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1216 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 42.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 48
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33357 vs 6406
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 vs 389
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11133 vs 1727
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1780
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2992
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2992
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9566 vs 2792
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9566 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33357 vs 6406 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 vs 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11133 vs 1727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6406 | 33357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 799 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 11133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 9566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4334 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 357 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 165 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins |