Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt

Launch date	10 July 2019 vs 27 July 2010
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 100 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Around 35% higher core clock speed: 405 MHz vs 300 MHz
6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23008 vs 6391
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 389
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2060 vs 1727
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 1780
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 1780
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 2992
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 2992

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	405 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	320 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	23008 vs 6391
PassMark - G2D Mark	426 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark	2060 vs 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	5249 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	5249 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7205 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7205 vs 2992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6391

23008

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

426

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1727

2060

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1780

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1780

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2992

7205

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2992

7205

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	6391	23008
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	426
PassMark - G3D Mark	1727	2060
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1780	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1780	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2992	7205
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2992	7205
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2792

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Essentials
Architecture	Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake)	Fermi
Code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	GF100
Launch date	10 July 2019	27 July 2010
Place in performance rating	813	414
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	405 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	320
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	100 Watt
Floating-point performance		518.4 gflops
Texture fill rate		16.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count		3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support	Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors		No outputs
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Memory type	DDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Shared memory	Yes	0
Maximum RAM amount		1792 MB
Memory bandwidth		76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2400 MHz
Technologies
H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large