Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22534 vs 6391
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 389
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6935 vs 1727
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 1780
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2992
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2992
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 2792
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 2792
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1076 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22534 vs 6391 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 vs 389 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6935 vs 1727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 vs 2792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6391 | 22534 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 644 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 6935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 10251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Pascal |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GP106 |
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 813 | 394 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
| Price now | $429.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1076 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 201 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
