Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD FirePro W4190M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD FirePro W4190M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 1148
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 180
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 1704
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 1704
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 12 November 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 1148 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 1704 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 7012
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2529 vs 1564
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2529 vs 1564
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3340
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3340
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 vs 7012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4190M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD FirePro W4190M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 1148 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 180 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 23384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 2529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 2529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 284.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD FirePro W4190M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Opal |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 12 November 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 1066 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
