Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 10.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7011 vs 4950
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 21 October 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7011 vs 4950 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- 23.3x more pipelines: 1120 vs 48
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1590
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 377
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 vs 2652
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 1564
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 1590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 407 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7011 | 4950 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.41 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Barts |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 852 | 831 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,700 million |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 220 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |