Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 907 MHz
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 30 October 2016
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 907 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

  • 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 1590
  • Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 377
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15221 vs 7012
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4664 vs 2652
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4664 vs 2652
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1842 vs 1564
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1842 vs 1564
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1024 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3453 vs 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 679 vs 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 15221 vs 7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4664 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4664 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1842 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1842 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1590
3453
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
377
679
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7012
15221
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2652
4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
1842
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3346
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon Pro 460
PassMark - G3D Mark 1590 3453
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 679
Geekbench - OpenCL 7012 15221
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2652 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2652 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1564 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1564 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 44.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 594.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 55.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 226.93

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 AMD Radeon Pro 460

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 4.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Baffin
Launch date 3 January 2017 30 October 2016
Place in performance rating 851 629
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 907 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 1,858 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 48 1024
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,000 million
Texture fill rate 58.05 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0