Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 907 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 30 October 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 907 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 1590
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 377
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15221 vs 7012
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4664 vs 2652
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4664 vs 2652
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1842 vs 1564
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1842 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3453 vs 1590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 679 vs 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15221 vs 7012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4664 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4664 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 3453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 15221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 594.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Baffin |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 629 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 907 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1024 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |