Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 12.3x better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 72 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 148
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 9 January 2009 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 369 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7011 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | M92 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 852 | 427 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 242 million |
Texture fill rate | 3.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |