Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and ATI Radeon HD 4850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 932
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 25 June 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 81 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16.7x more pipelines: 800 vs 48
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,000.0 gflops vs 883 gflops
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV770 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 25 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 1272 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 246 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |