Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and ATI Radeon HD 4890 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 12.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 1508
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 75
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 2 April 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 1508 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 75 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4890
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16.7x more pipelines: 800 vs 48
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 883 gflops
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4890
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Radeon HD 4890 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 1508 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 75 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Radeon HD 4890 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV790 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 2 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 1242 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 959 million |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 124.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |