Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs ATI Radeon X600
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and ATI Radeon X600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 36 Watt
- 128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
- 27.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 57
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 210
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 September 2004 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 36 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 vs 57 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 210 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Radeon X600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 57 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 210 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7011 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | ATI Radeon X600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV370 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 852 | 837 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 107 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |