Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GRID K2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2x 4 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 319
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 344
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 344
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 312
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 312
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 11 May 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2x 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 312 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 64x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 48
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 1590
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10352 vs 7011
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 2652
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 vs 1590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10352 vs 7011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 vs 2652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GRID K2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 2737 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 319 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7011 | 10352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.51 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 114.144 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GRID K2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 11 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 852 | 971 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 2x 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |