Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 27 October 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 255 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 vs 1590
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 vs 7012
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 vs 2652
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1564
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 vs 1590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 vs 7012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 2108 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 255 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 8099 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 27 October 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 950 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIRadeon X300
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
