Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 945M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce 945M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 255
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 27 October 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 255 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 vs 1590
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 vs 7012
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2961 vs 2652
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2961 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1564
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 vs 1590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 vs 7012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 2108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 8099 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 2961 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 2961 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 27 October 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 950 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |