Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 883 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 21.5x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1526 MB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 303
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 6858
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 22 March 2012 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1526 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 vs 6858 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 598 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 7x more pipelines: 336 vs 48
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1737 vs 1590
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2731 vs 2652
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2731 vs 2652
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 1564
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 336 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 vs 1590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 1737 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 6858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF114 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 966 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 598 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1526 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |