Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 22.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 117
- 14.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 108.2
- 27.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 119.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 119.7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 883 gflops
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 2652
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 1564
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3340
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 119.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 8 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 887 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
