Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 350
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7012 vs 5107
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 7 August 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 vs 5107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
- 2x more core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 28x more pipelines: 1344 vs 48
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2752 vs 1590
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 2652
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1564
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,615 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2752 vs 1590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4825 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4825 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1590 | 2752 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7012 | 5107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 | 4825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 | 4825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.713 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 685.1 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.189 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.929 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.712 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK104 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 7 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 802 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329.99 | |
| Price now | $391 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.47 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 601 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1344 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Texture fill rate | 67.31 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650 vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
