Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD FirePro W4190M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

AMD FirePro W4190M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 1163
Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 183
Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 vs 284.018
Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 1.417
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1704
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1704

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2017 vs 12 November 2015
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1739 vs 1163
PassMark - G2D Mark	363 vs 183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	465.116 vs 284.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.796 vs 1.417
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2780 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2780 vs 1704

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 7346
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2529 vs 1884
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3343
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2529 vs 1884
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3343

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	825 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 48
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384 vs 7346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2529 vs 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2529 vs 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4190M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1739

1163

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

363

183

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7346

23384

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

465.116

284.018

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.796

1.417

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2780

1704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1884

2529

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3343

3889

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2780

1704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1884

2529

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3343

3889

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	AMD FirePro W4190M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1739	1163
PassMark - G2D Mark	363	183
Geekbench - OpenCL	7346	23384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	465.116	284.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.796	1.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	54.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2780	1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1884	2529
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3343	3889
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2780	1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1884	2529
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3343	3889
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	619

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	AMD FirePro W4190M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Code name	Coffee Lake GT3e	Opal
Launch date	1 September 2017	12 November 2015
Place in performance rating	1042	1066
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	900 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	825 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,040 million
Floating-point performance		691.2 gflops
Texture fill rate		21.6 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size		medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Memory type	DDR3 / DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		64 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		4000 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay