Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1742 vs 1071
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 193
  • Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7379 vs 6339
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 2343
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 2343
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1742 vs 1071
PassMark - G2D Mark 363 vs 193
Geekbench - OpenCL 7379 vs 6339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780 vs 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780 vs 2343

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 1884
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 1884
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2405 vs 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2405 vs 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1742
1071
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
363
193
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7379
6339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2780
2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1884
2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2780
2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1884
2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3346
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 1742 1071
PassMark - G2D Mark 363 193
Geekbench - OpenCL 7379 6339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 54.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1884 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1884 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 619

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 3.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT3e Topaz
Launch date 1 September 2017 18 April 2017
Place in performance rating 1042 990
Type Laptop Desktop
Design Radeon 500 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1024 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 730 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 834 M
Compute units 6
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops
Pixel fill rate 8.20 GP/s
Render output units 8
Stream Processors 384
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s
Texture Units 24

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory type DDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support