Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1742 vs 1071
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 193
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7379 vs 6339
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 2343
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 2343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 vs 1071 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7379 vs 6339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 2343 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 1884
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 | 1071 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7379 | 6339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Topaz |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 990 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 834 M |
Compute units | 6 | |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |