Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450A
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon HD 6450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 260
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 208
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 7 April 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 208 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450A
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 6450A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 6450A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 7 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 807 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Floating-point performance | 200 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.53 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz |