Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1166
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1166
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 5 September 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 1166 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2589 vs 1884
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4574 vs 3343
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2589 vs 1884
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4574 vs 3343
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2589 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2589 vs 1884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7346 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 4574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 4574 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 5 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1022 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7950 GTX
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
