Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 851
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 223
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7344 vs 7050
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1430
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 vs 1843
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1430
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 vs 1843
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 30 June 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 851 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 223 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 vs 7050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 vs 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 vs 1843 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3343
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3343
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 851 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 223 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | 7050 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 5002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 5002 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Hainan |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1018 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz |