Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 851
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 223
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7344 vs 7050
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1430
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 vs 1843
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1430
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 vs 1843
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 30 June 2016
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1739 vs 851
PassMark - G2D Mark 363 vs 223
Geekbench - OpenCL 7344 vs 7050
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780 vs 1430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1884 vs 1843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780 vs 1430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1884 vs 1843

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3343
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3343
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 5002 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 5002 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1739
851
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
363
223
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7344
7050
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2780
1430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1884
1843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
5002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2780
1430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1884
1843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
5002
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1739 851
PassMark - G2D Mark 363 223
Geekbench - OpenCL 7344 7050
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 54.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780 1430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1884 1843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 5002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780 1430
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1884 1843
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 5002
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 619

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT3e Hainan
Launch date 1 September 2017 30 June 2016
Place in performance rating 1042 1018
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1030 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 320
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Memory type DDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 16 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz