Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 21.562
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 2.2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 20 December 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 21.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 vs 2.2 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 465.116
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 vs 29.115
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 vs 54.932
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 2780
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1884
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 2780
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 vs 465.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 vs 29.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 vs 54.932 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 vs 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 vs 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7379 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 21.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 582.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 2.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 38.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 98.052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 2873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 2873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R7 250E | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 20 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1066 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz |