Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon R8 M445DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1021 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1742 vs 797
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 181
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1427
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1427
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1021 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 vs 797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 1427 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 14.7x more pipelines: 704 vs 48
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21666 vs 7379
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2636 vs 1884
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2636 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21666 vs 7379 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2636 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2636 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R8 M445DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 | 797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 181 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7379 | 21666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 2636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R8 M445DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Meso |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1006 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 704 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR4 / DDR3 |
Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | |
Shared memory | 0 |