Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Mobility FireGL T2
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Mobility FireGL T2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 42.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 41
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 171
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 November 2003 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 171 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility FireGL T2
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 320 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 320 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL T2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility FireGL T2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility FireGL T2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 8 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | M10 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 November 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1001 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 320 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 76 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.28 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | 128 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 200 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |