Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 52.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 33
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 205
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 18 September 2006 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 205 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 205 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | R500 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | M64 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 18 September 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 859 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 550 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 107 million |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | 128 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 450 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |