Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X300
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and ATI Mobility Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.4x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 51.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 34
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 204
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 November 2005 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 204 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X300
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 204 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ATI Mobility Radeon X300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | M22 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 November 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 860 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 107 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | 64 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 250 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PCIe |