Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 141 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 507
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 88
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 vs 15.56
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 16 January 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 141 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 507 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 vs 15.56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
- 6.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.055 vs 37.109
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.986 vs 2.796
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.412 vs 54.932
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.055 vs 37.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.986 vs 2.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.412 vs 54.932 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 507 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 88 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 54.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 4.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 15.56 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 108.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | G92B |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 16 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1307 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1836 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 141 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |