Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 59 Watt
- 42.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 41
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 23 October 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 59 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 vs 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 vs 170 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 170 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rankine |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | NV35 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1002 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 59 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 135 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Length | 218 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 27.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 850 MHz |