Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 36.256

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 28x more pipelines: 1344 vs 48
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4407 vs 1739
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 vs 363
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15189 vs 7344
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 465.116
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.001 vs 2.796
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 29.115
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 54.932
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 2780
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1884
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 2780
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1884
• 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1616 vs 619

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1739 4407
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 461
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7344 15189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.109 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.116 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.796 3.001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.115 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.932 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 1616

Compare specifications (specs)