Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 vs 26.532

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 1739
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 363
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11310 vs 7344
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 37.109
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 465.116
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.796
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 54.932
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2780
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1884
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2780
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1884
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1265 vs 619

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1739 3904
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 512
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7344 11310
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.109 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465.116 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.796 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.115 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.932 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2780 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1884 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 1265

Compare specifications (specs)