Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 1 January 2016
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
  • Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 37.109
  • Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 465.116
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 2.796
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 29.115
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 vs 54.932
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 924 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1024 vs 48
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 56.869 vs 37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 917.535 vs 465.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.351 vs 2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.323 vs 29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 86.304 vs 54.932

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37.109
56.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
465.116
917.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.796
3.351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.115
37.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
54.932
86.304
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1739
PassMark - G2D Mark 363
Geekbench - OpenCL 7344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.109 56.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.116 917.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.796 3.351
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.115 37.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 54.932 86.304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 619

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT3e GM206
Launch date 1 September 2017 1 January 2016
Place in performance rating 1042 1174
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 950 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 924 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 1024
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,940 million
Floating-point performance 1,946 gflops
Texture fill rate 60.8 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Memory type DDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz