Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 10.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 152 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 16.451
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 1.925
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.115 vs 17.065
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.932 vs 46.591
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 2602
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3316
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 2602
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 23 February 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 152 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 vs 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 vs 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 vs 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 513 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 7.3x more pipelines: 352 vs 48
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1929 vs 1739
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 363
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7491 vs 7346
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 vs 465.116
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3104 vs 1884
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3104 vs 1884
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 513 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 352 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1929 vs 1739 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7491 vs 7346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 511.131 vs 465.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3104 vs 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3104 vs 1884 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 1929 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7346 | 7491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3316 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 23 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1042 | 978 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $268 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 352 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 152 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 22.57 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2560 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz |