Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 586
7.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 46
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3272
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3272

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2017 vs 14 August 2008
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1739 vs 586
PassMark - G2D Mark	363 vs 46
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3343 vs 3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3343 vs 3272

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

2.3x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48

Core clock speed	675 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	128 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1739

586

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

363

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3343

3272

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3343

3272

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1739	586
PassMark - G2D Mark	363	46
Geekbench - OpenCL	7344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	465.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	54.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3343	3272
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3343	3272
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	619

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Tesla
Code name	Coffee Lake GT3e	G92
Launch date	1 September 2017	14 August 2008
Place in performance rating	1042	1403
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	48	128
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	754 million
Floating-point performance		422.4 gflops
Texture fill rate		43.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Memory type	DDR3 / DDR4	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2000 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0