Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 24.00 GB/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6147 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.129 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake GT2 | Oland |
Launch price (MSRP) | $969 | |
Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1148 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 780 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1690 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 845 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |