Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and AMD Radeon Pro 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2495
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2495
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 16 July 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 1024 vs 64
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5367 vs 3751
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5367 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17534 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 16 July 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 672 | 543 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1004 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro D300
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
