Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 vs 2524
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 vs 2524
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3274
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3274
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Polaris |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Lexa |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 670 | 812 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.62 GTexel/s | |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Length | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro D500
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro D300
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
