Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3687
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 1 February 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- 5x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 768 vs 64
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 3751
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20098 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Pascal |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GP106B |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 1 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 672 | 554 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro D300
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
