Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 vs 2664
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 vs 2664
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3626
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3626
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3318
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3318
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 May 2019 vs 28 June 2011
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3751 vs 2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3751 vs 2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3626
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3626
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3318
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3318

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 6x more pipelines: 384 vs 64
Core clock speed 620 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 64

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3626
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3626
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3318
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3318
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3751 2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3751 2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3626
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3626
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3318
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3318
PassMark - G3D Mark 2074
PassMark - G2D Mark 349
Geekbench - OpenCL 6389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 690.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.702
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.215

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) Fermi 2.0
Code name Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 GF114
Launch date 28 May 2019 28 June 2011
Place in performance rating 669 918
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 620 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 40 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.25 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.12 TFLOPS
Pipelines 64 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt
CUDA cores 384
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops
Texture fill rate 39.7 billion / sec
Transistor count 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 API
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory type DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 96.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None