Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 vs 2664
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 vs 2664
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3626
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3626
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3318
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3318
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 28 June 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 vs 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 vs 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3318 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 384 vs 64
Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 64 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3318 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2074 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.702 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF114 |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 28 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 669 | 918 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 64 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 100 Watt |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |