Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 vs 3501
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 vs 3501
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3689
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3689
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 10 December 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 7x more pipelines: 448 vs 64
Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 448 vs 64 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3335 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2706 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 448 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Fermi |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF100 |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 10 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 669 | 779 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
Price now | $332.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 64 | 448 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 204 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |