Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 29 June 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 773 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 26x more pipelines: 1664 vs 64
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 vs 3751
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 6291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3332 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6690 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 29 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 672 | 517 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
| Price now | $765.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 773 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 1664 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro D300
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
