Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1013 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2749
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2749
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3093
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3093
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 May 2019 vs 18 August 2015
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1013 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3093

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 20x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 64
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 3751
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 3751
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 975 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1,280 vs 64
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7602 vs 3751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7602 vs 3751

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3093
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3751 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3751 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3093
PassMark - G3D Mark 6226
PassMark - G2D Mark 423
Geekbench - OpenCL 18998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 251.464
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) Maxwell 2.0
Code name Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 GM204
Launch date 28 May 2019 18 August 2015
Place in performance rating 669 547
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1013 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.25 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.12 TFLOPS
Pipelines 64 1,280
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s
Transistor count 5,200 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.2

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenGL 4.5
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Memory type DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None