Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 151 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5081 vs 4950
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 21 October 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 vs 4950 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 28x more pipelines: 1120 vs 40
- 19.4x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1191
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 399
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 vs 2095
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3285
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 407 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | 4238 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 | 4950 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3711 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.41 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Barts |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 642 | 831 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 220 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |