Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs ATI FirePro V8800
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and ATI FirePro V8800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.9x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 208 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 7 April 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 208 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 40x more pipelines: 1600 vs 40
- 25.4x better floating-point performance: 2,640.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2281 vs 1191
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 399
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36751 vs 5081
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3575 vs 3285
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3575 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 vs 5081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | ATI FirePro V8800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | 2281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 | 36751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.27 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | ATI FirePro V8800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Cypress |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 7 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 642 | 703 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 208 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |