Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1191 vs 463
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 375
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 9 January 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 vs 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 375 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 320 vs 40
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2907 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | M96 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 644 | 688 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |