Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 151 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 30 September 2009 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 36x more pipelines: 1440 vs 40
- 20.1x better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1979 vs 1191
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 399
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 vs 2095
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 vs 2095
- 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 5081
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3285
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1979 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 vs 399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 vs 2095 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 vs 5081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | 1979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 402 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | 3806 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 | 33977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Cypress |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 30 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 644 | 757 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 1440 |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity |