Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1191 vs 811
  • Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 203
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2013 vs 3 September 2010
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1191 vs 811
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 vs 203
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3285 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3285 vs 3274

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

  • 5.9x more core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 10.6 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s
  • 3.6x more pipelines: 144 vs 40
  • 3.3x better floating-point performance: 339.8 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12379 vs 5081
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1180 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate 10.6 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 144 vs 40
Floating-point performance 339.8 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 12379 vs 5081

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1191
811
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
399
203
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5081
12379
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3285
3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3285
3274
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1191 811
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 203
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2095
Geekbench - OpenCL 5081 12379
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3285 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3285 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Fermi
Code name Haswell GT3e GF106
Launch date 27 May 2013 3 September 2010
Place in performance rating 642 865
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 1180 MHz
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 339.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 40 144
Texture fill rate 10.4 GTexel / s 10.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 392 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 144

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.3 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 60.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI