Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 55 nm
- 9.6x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 289 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 8 January 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 289 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- 6.2x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 8.9x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 2x 240 vs 40
- 11.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 596.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1206 vs 1191
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21048 vs 5081
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3443 vs 3285
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3443 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 240 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 vs 1191 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 vs 5081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | 1206 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 | 21048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GT200B |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 644 | 933 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 2x 240 |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 289 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |