Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
  • 8.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 247 Watt
Launch date 27 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 247 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

  • 2.9x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
  • 11.2x more pipelines: 448 vs 40
  • 9.9x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 1191
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 399
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2825 vs 2095
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2825 vs 2095
  • Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9885 vs 5072
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3285
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3285
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 448 vs 40
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3017 vs 1191
PassMark - G2D Mark 428 vs 399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2825 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2825 vs 2095
Geekbench - OpenCL 9885 vs 5072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 vs 3285

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1191
3017
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
399
428
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2095
2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2095
2825
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5072
9885
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3285
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3285
3705
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 NVIDIA Tesla C2075
PassMark - G3D Mark 1191 3017
PassMark - G2D Mark 399 428
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2095 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2095 2825
Geekbench - OpenCL 5072 9885
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3285 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3285 3705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 930.623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 45.924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.747
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Fermi 2.0
Code name Haswell GT3e GF110
Launch date 27 May 2013 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 642 777
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 40 448
Texture fill rate 10.4 GTexel / s 32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 247 Watt
Transistor count 392 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.3 4.6

Memory

Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 3000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync