Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 247 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 247 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 11.2x more pipelines: 448 vs 40
- 9.9x better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 1191
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 399
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2825 vs 2095
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2825 vs 2095
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9885 vs 5072
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3285
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 vs 399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 vs 2095 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9885 vs 5072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | 3017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | 2825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | 2825 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5072 | 9885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GF110 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 642 | 777 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 247 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |