Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 988
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 309
• 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 6.303
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 392.237
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 0.597
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 vs 17.874
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1747
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 6.7x more pipelines: 480 vs 72
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12641 vs 8750
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 67.077
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 1668
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3355
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 1668
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 988
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 309
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8750 12641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.11 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	450.087 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.059 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.346 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.077 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2846 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 7745

Compare specifications (specs)